Interactive Brokers comments on patent infringement lawsuit outcome
A jury has returned a verdict in a patent trial in which Trading Technologies had accused Interactive Brokers of willfully infringing its patents.
A jury has returned a verdict in a patent trial in which Trading Technologies had accused Interactive Brokers of willfully infringing its patents.
OANDA accuses GAIN Capital of waging a campaign to delay litigating OANDA’s claims in a patent infringement lawsuit.
OANDA and GAIN Capital fail to agree on confidentiality of materials to be produced by non-parties in the patent infringement lawsuit.
GAIN Capital asks the Court to rule that OANDA’s patent claims are invalid for lack of patent eligibility.
OANDA admits that there is a controversy between the brokers regarding patent infringement, but denies that a Declaratory Judgment is warranted.
OANDA has filed an amended patent infringement complaint against GAIN Capital and its retail FX brand Forex.com.
GAIN Capital is dismayed by OANDA’s unwillingness to explain whether it will be filing an amended pleading.
OANDA has failed to identify how GAIN’s product allegedly infringes each claim of the patents in this lawsuit.
StoneX, the parent of Forex.com and City Index, would like the discovery to be stayed, whereas OANDA disagrees.
The Court has agreed with StoneX to grant it extra 30 days to respond to OANDA’s patent infringement allegations.