The following is a guest editorial courtesy of Carolane de Palmas, Markets Analyst at Retail FX and CFDs broker ActivTrades.

---

European investors are showing little appetite for abandoning risk assets this summer, even as parts of the global technology trade have become more volatile. July’s ETF flows suggest that, rather than retreating from equities, investors are using exchange-traded products to maintain exposure to the themes they expect to drive markets over the coming years.

European ETFs and exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) attracted €47.3 billion of net inflows in July, up from €36.8 billion in June. That lifted cumulative inflows for the first seven months of 2026 to almost €266 billion. Yet total assets remained broadly unchanged at €3.22 trillion, compared with €3.23 trillion in June, as market losses offset the fresh capital entering the industry.

The most important message for traders is therefore not simply that money continues to enter ETFs. It is where that money is going — and what investors are refusing to sell.

Equity demand remains remarkably resilient

Equity ETFs absorbed €34.2 billion in July, up from €29.9 billion in June, taking year-to-date inflows to €203.4 billion. That represents more than three-quarters of all European ETF inflows so far this year.

At first glance, this looks surprising. July brought renewed volatility across technology stocks, while concerns surrounding enormous AI capital expenditure, elevated valuations and the sustainability of the technology rally continued to circulate. Yet European investors did not respond by aggressively rotating into traditional defensive or value strategies.

Instead, much of the new money continued to target global developed-market and US equity exposure. This matters because many supposedly diversified global large-cap ETFs remain heavily influenced by US equities. European ETF flows are therefore still providing an important indirect source of capital for Wall Street’s largest companies.

The lack of a meaningful rotation toward value or smaller caps is perhaps even more revealing. Global large-cap value ETFs recorded the largest equity-category outflow in July, at €589 million. That suggests investors are not necessarily questioning the AI investment cycle. They may instead be questioning which companies will ultimately capture its economic benefits.

A technology correction does not automatically imply a structural shift away from AI. It could simply represent a repricing of the most expensive beneficiaries while capital continues to seek exposure through broader indices, semiconductors, infrastructure and other parts of the AI supply chain.

The broader 2026 trend supports this interpretation. Earlier in the year, passive funds captured a substantial share of European fund flows, while investors continued to favor global and equity-market strategies despite geopolitical uncertainty.

Investors are not simply buying the dip

The July data also reveal something important about investor psychology.

When a popular market theme suffers a correction, there are usually two possible interpretations. Investors can view the decline as a signal that the underlying thesis is weakening, or they can see it as an opportunity to maintain exposure at lower prices.

The ETF flows suggest the second interpretation currently has the upper hand.

If European investors were becoming genuinely concerned about the long-term technology and AI story, one would expect stronger flows toward value, defensive equities, cash-like products or non-US markets. Instead, broad equity exposure remained dominant.

This does not mean investors are blindly bullish. Rather, they appear to be distinguishing between short-term valuation risk and long-term structural growth. For traders, that distinction could become increasingly important during the second half of the year.

If technology stocks experience another correction but ETF inflows remain strong, the market could interpret weakness as a positioning opportunity rather than the beginning of a broader de-risking cycle. Conversely, a sustained deterioration in flows toward global and US equity ETFs would represent a much more significant warning signal than short-term volatility in the Nasdaq.

Bonds are becoming the second pillar of ETF demand

The other major development is occurring in fixed income: European bond ETFs attracted €8.8 billion in July, up from €7.6 billion in June. Year-to-date inflows reached €47.7 billion, representing 17.9% of all ETF flows in Europe.

Government bonds were particularly popular, with close to €1.5 billion flowing into euro-denominated government bond ETFs and another €655 million into US Treasury ETFs. Fixed-term bond ETFs also gathered €348 million during the month.

This creates an interesting contrast with equity flows. Investors are simultaneously maintaining substantial exposure to the AI-led equity cycle while adding government bonds. Rather than signalling a straightforward risk-off move, this looks more like portfolio diversification around a still-bullish core.

Investors may be trying to capture equity-market growth while increasing exposure to assets that could benefit from changing interest-rate expectations or provide greater portfolio stability if equity volatility increases.

The growing interest in collateralized loan obligation (CLO) ETFs adds another dimension. CLO ETFs attracted €515 million in July alone and €2.4 billion during the first seven months of the year. That suggests investors are also searching for income and alternative sources of yield beyond traditional government debt.

The fixed-income ETF market therefore deserves greater attention as monetary-policy expectations evolve. Changes in inflation, central-bank policy and sovereign yields could determine whether the next phase of ETF growth is driven primarily by equities or by a broader reallocation toward bonds.

Active ETFs are quietly becoming a bigger story

Another structural shift taking place beneath the headline ETF flows is the rise of actively managed ETFs. A traditional passive ETF generally seeks to replicate an index such as the S&P 500 or MSCI World. An active ETF, by contrast, gives a portfolio manager discretion over security selection, portfolio weightings and, depending on the strategy, risk exposure.

The attraction is that investors can combine active management with the ETF structure. They can access a manager’s research and investment decisions while retaining features associated with ETFs, including intraday trading and portfolio transparency. This is particularly relevant in markets where simply owning the broad index may not be enough.

If valuations become stretched in parts of the technology sector, for example, an active manager can potentially reduce exposure to expensive companies, identify businesses better positioned to benefit from AI spending or rotate between sectors as economic conditions change.

The growth numbers suggest investors are increasingly interested in this flexibility. European active ETF assets reached €85.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2026, up from €52.5 billion at the end of 2024. By the end of June, assets had climbed further to €108.3 billion, almost triple their level at the end of 2023.

Active ETFs still represent only a small proportion of the European ETF market, however. That leaves significant room for further growth as investors become more familiar with the structure and asset managers continue launching new products.

The appeal also extends beyond equities. Active bond ETFs can allow managers to adjust duration, credit exposure and yield-curve positioning as monetary-policy expectations change. This may help explain why active fixed-income strategies have been gaining traction alongside equity products.

For asset managers, the opportunity is significant. Traditional active managers have increasingly embraced the ETF wrapper because it gives them access to a distribution channel that has become highly popular with investors. Morningstar notes that many established active managers previously avoided ETFs because of their association with low-cost passive investing, but are now entering the market to benefit from the ETF structure and its growing investor reach.

The competition is consequently intensifying. J.P. Morgan remains the dominant European active ETF provider, while firms including iShares, Pimco, Invesco and other major asset managers are expanding their presence. Product launches have also accelerated sharply, suggesting that the market is still in an early stage of development.

For traders, the rise of active ETFs is worth watching because it could gradually change how institutional and retail capital moves through markets. ETF flows may increasingly provide a window not only into broad investor sentiment, but also into how professional managers are positioning portfolios.

What July ETF flows mean for traders

The bigger picture is that European investors are not behaving as though the AI trade is over. They are behaving as though it is maturing.

Capital continues to enter equity ETFs despite periods of technology-sector weakness, while government bonds and income-oriented products are attracting additional money. At the same time, active ETFs are gaining traction as investors look for greater flexibility within the ETF structure.

Investors are not simply choosing between risk-on and risk-off. They are building portfolios around several competing themes: continued exposure to US and global equities, growing demand for fixed income, interest in alternative sources of yield and an increasing willingness to pay for active portfolio management within an ETF wrapper.

That makes ETF flows an increasingly useful sentiment indicator for traders. A sustained deterioration in flows toward US and global equities would provide a much stronger warning signal than a few days of technology-sector weakness. Conversely, continued inflows despite market pullbacks would suggest that investors are treating corrections as opportunities to maintain or increase exposure.

July’s numbers therefore point to a market that is not abandoning risk, but becoming more selective about it. For traders watching the second half of 2026, the key question is whether the next wave of ETF capital continues to finance the same US technology leaders — or starts spreading across the broader ecosystem of companies, sectors and asset classes positioned to benefit from the investment cycle.

Source: MorningStar, LSEG

The information provided does not constitute investment research. The material has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is to be considered to be a marketing communication.

All information has been prepared by ActivTrades (“AT”). The information does not contain a record of AT’s prices, or an offer of or solicitation for a transaction in any financial instrument. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Any material provided does not have regard to the specific investment objective and financial situation of any person who may receive it. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. AT provides an execution-only service. Consequently, any person acting on the information provided does so at their own risk. Forecasts are not guarantees. Rates may change. Political risk is unpredictable. Central bank actions may vary. Platforms’ tools do not guarantee success.